<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BETA &#8211; Using NFS on ESX 3.0 and VirtualCenter 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2006/04/17/using-nfs-on-esx-30-and-virtualcenter-20-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2006/04/17/using-nfs-on-esx-30-and-virtualcenter-20-beta/</link>
	<description>Beyond the Manual, with Mike Laverick (VCI, VCP, CCI, CCEA, MCT, MCSE)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storage and network planning takeaways from Iowa virtualization user group meeting - Virtualization Pro: A SearchVMware.com blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2006/04/17/using-nfs-on-esx-30-and-virtualcenter-20-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-28292</link>
		<dc:creator>Storage and network planning takeaways from Iowa virtualization user group meeting - Virtualization Pro: A SearchVMware.com blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/?p=225#comment-28292</guid>
		<description>[...] NFS vs. Fibre Channel and iSCSI The NFS configuration how-to Clark followed was posted by Mike Laverick on RTFM Education and was chosen for the demo not only because of itâ€™s easy configuration, but also because implementing Red Hat NFS is a good low-cost alternative to shelling out big cash for more expensive devices for virtual machines (VM) storage. â€œMost people think that you need a Fibre Channel SAN [storage area network] or an iSCSI SAN; youâ€™ll spend at least 20 or 30 grand on that device. But all you really need is a reasonably new server with some pretty fast discs, and you can basically have a SAN for the cost of your hardware.â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NFS vs. Fibre Channel and iSCSI The NFS configuration how-to Clark followed was posted by Mike Laverick on RTFM Education and was chosen for the demo not only because of itâ€™s easy configuration, but also because implementing Red Hat NFS is a good low-cost alternative to shelling out big cash for more expensive devices for virtual machines (VM) storage. â€œMost people think that you need a Fibre Channel SAN [storage area network] or an iSCSI SAN; youâ€™ll spend at least 20 or 30 grand on that device. But all you really need is a reasonably new server with some pretty fast discs, and you can basically have a SAN for the cost of your hardware.â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

