<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VirtInfo: Short-Takes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2008/07/05/virtinfo-short-takes-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2008/07/05/virtinfo-short-takes-3/</link>
	<description>Beyond the Manual, with Mike Laverick (VCI, VCP, CCI, CCEA, MCT, MCSE)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Short Take #12 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2008/07/05/virtinfo-short-takes-3/comment-page-1/#comment-28536</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Short Take #12 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/?p=561#comment-28536</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Mike Laverick, I learned that Microsoft may have brought up the whole 64-bit hypervisor vs. 32-bit hypervisor argument yet again. Mike used a snippet from this Microsoft Virtualization Team Blog entry; in reading it myself, I don&#8217;t get quite the same 64-bit vs. 32-bit that Mike picked up. That&#8217;s good, because I didn&#8217;t want to have to go there again. Personally, the tone I picked up from the whole article was one of educating people far too accustomed to Virtual Server/VirtualPC and trying to educate them on how Hyper-V is different. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Mike Laverick, I learned that Microsoft may have brought up the whole 64-bit hypervisor vs. 32-bit hypervisor argument yet again. Mike used a snippet from this Microsoft Virtualization Team Blog entry; in reading it myself, I don&#8217;t get quite the same 64-bit vs. 32-bit that Mike picked up. That&#8217;s good, because I didn&#8217;t want to have to go there again. Personally, the tone I picked up from the whole article was one of educating people far too accustomed to Virtual Server/VirtualPC and trying to educate them on how Hyper-V is different. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

