<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware vSphere 4.0 Update1 &#8220;A&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2009/12/10/vmware-vsphere-40-update1-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2009/12/10/vmware-vsphere-40-update1-a/</link>
	<description>Beyond the Manual, with Mike Laverick (VCI, VCP, CCI, CCEA, MCT, MCSE)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Laverick</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2009/12/10/vmware-vsphere-40-update1-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42964</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Laverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/?p=2021#comment-42964</guid>
		<description>Well, I never really did conclusively get to the bottom of my network problems. Although have appeared for the moment to &quot;go away&quot;. Yeah, I don&#039;t you just love it when a problem randomly resolves itself - and your clueless to why. But a couple of points. Firstly, I&#039;m still running on Update 1(a) - and I&#039;m not convinced that U1(a) was the source of the problem. Secondly, I was using vmxnet on W2K3-32-Enterprize on a physical switch that wouldn&#039;t support any of the advanced features - I&#039;ve rolled back to using the &#039;Flexible&#039; vmxnet driver - and that did NOT appear to be a killer. I&#039;ve heard tales in the Linux world that the vmxnet3 driver caused problems. Thirdly, I team my NICs using &quot;originating port ID&quot;. This is meant to be ultra-compatible with any pSwitch configuration which is a must for me because I have the cheapest netgear gigabit switch in my lab environment. Occasionally, I split the NICs across two of these netgears simply because I&#039;ve run out of ports. In the past (3.5) this didn&#039;t cause a problem - and is of course best practise. Switching to a single vSwitch with single vmnic seems to have made things much better. SO... now I&#039;m wondering if it is pSwitch that&#039;s the problem or fault nic - causing an intermittent network outage... Putting my virtual dc, vc, sql, srm all on the same vSwitch has helped - because well, then there is no physical layer to worry about (except when the two SRM/VC&#039;s need to chat to each other). 

In short there doesn&#039;t appear to be any reason - and the fact the problem disappeared isn&#039;t one that reassures me it won&#039;t come back again. I&#039;m investing in single pSwitch that&#039;s 48 ports to see if it is indeed a physical problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I never really did conclusively get to the bottom of my network problems. Although have appeared for the moment to &#8220;go away&#8221;. Yeah, I don&#8217;t you just love it when a problem randomly resolves itself &#8211; and your clueless to why. But a couple of points. Firstly, I&#8217;m still running on Update 1(a) &#8211; and I&#8217;m not convinced that U1(a) was the source of the problem. Secondly, I was using vmxnet on W2K3-32-Enterprize on a physical switch that wouldn&#8217;t support any of the advanced features &#8211; I&#8217;ve rolled back to using the &#8216;Flexible&#8217; vmxnet driver &#8211; and that did NOT appear to be a killer. I&#8217;ve heard tales in the Linux world that the vmxnet3 driver caused problems. Thirdly, I team my NICs using &#8220;originating port ID&#8221;. This is meant to be ultra-compatible with any pSwitch configuration which is a must for me because I have the cheapest netgear gigabit switch in my lab environment. Occasionally, I split the NICs across two of these netgears simply because I&#8217;ve run out of ports. In the past (3.5) this didn&#8217;t cause a problem &#8211; and is of course best practise. Switching to a single vSwitch with single vmnic seems to have made things much better. SO&#8230; now I&#8217;m wondering if it is pSwitch that&#8217;s the problem or fault nic &#8211; causing an intermittent network outage&#8230; Putting my virtual dc, vc, sql, srm all on the same vSwitch has helped &#8211; because well, then there is no physical layer to worry about (except when the two SRM/VC&#8217;s need to chat to each other). </p>
<p>In short there doesn&#8217;t appear to be any reason &#8211; and the fact the problem disappeared isn&#8217;t one that reassures me it won&#8217;t come back again. I&#8217;m investing in single pSwitch that&#8217;s 48 ports to see if it is indeed a physical problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2009/12/10/vmware-vsphere-40-update1-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42960</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/?p=2021#comment-42960</guid>
		<description>Mike, were you ever able to attribute your SRM issues to Update 1. We&#039;re working on an SRM 4 and U1 deployment and having very strange connectivity issues. We get disconnected repeatedly from the remote SRM server.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, were you ever able to attribute your SRM issues to Update 1. We&#8217;re working on an SRM 4 and U1 deployment and having very strange connectivity issues. We get disconnected repeatedly from the remote SRM server.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2009/12/10/vmware-vsphere-40-update1-a/comment-page-1/#comment-41982</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/?p=2021#comment-41982</guid>
		<description>Had a similar problem. We didn&#039;t upgrade our vSphere to U1 but left it at release build. All my ESXi hosts were fine with no management agents on them. Everything looked good until after the reboot -

8 hosts running ESXi (latest and greatest) showed up in vSphere as 3.5 hosts (of assorted builds). vSphere tried to install ESX agents on ESXi hosts - not a good choice.

6 hours with vmware support and do you know what fixed it? Timing reboots of the host with vSphere service restarts. I call that getting lucky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a similar problem. We didn&#8217;t upgrade our vSphere to U1 but left it at release build. All my ESXi hosts were fine with no management agents on them. Everything looked good until after the reboot -</p>
<p>8 hosts running ESXi (latest and greatest) showed up in vSphere as 3.5 hosts (of assorted builds). vSphere tried to install ESX agents on ESXi hosts &#8211; not a good choice.</p>
<p>6 hours with vmware support and do you know what fixed it? Timing reboots of the host with vSphere service restarts. I call that getting lucky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: View 4 &#38; PCoIP &#8211; a few problems &#171; VM Junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/2009/12/10/vmware-vsphere-40-update1-a/comment-page-1/#comment-41887</link>
		<dc:creator>View 4 &#38; PCoIP &#8211; a few problems &#171; VM Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtfm-ed.co.uk/?p=2021#comment-41887</guid>
		<description>[...] are pretty rough edges. Add that to a lot of the issues with vSphere Update 1 (well documented by Mike Laverick) and it looks to me like View 4 really was released too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are pretty rough edges. Add that to a lot of the issues with vSphere Update 1 (well documented by Mike Laverick) and it looks to me like View 4 really was released too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

